Skip to content
CertMapCertMap

VERGLEICHE

CC or Security+? The Free Entry Point and the Job-Market Classic

Both are entry-level certifications with no admission barrier, both cover the fundamentals of cybersecurity, and yet they stand for different strategies: one as a low-threshold, temporarily free start, the other as an established credential with weight in the job market. The comparison with the numbers and the opposing cost logic.

By Daniel Thomas HeesselLast updated: August 12, 20266 min read

"CC or Security+" is the entry-level question par excellence for anyone looking to earn their first cybersecurity certification. The honest answer: the two test similar fundamentals but pursue different strategies. One opens the door to as many people as possible, the other has established itself over years as the standard credential in job postings.


Unlike the comparisons further up the career ladder, this is not about role profiles but about the starting point: both certifications are deliberately built without an admission barrier and address the entry phase, albeit at different points. The difference lies in the model behind them and in what the market has made of them.

What the two stand for

The CC (ISC2 Certified in Cybersecurity) is the entry-level certification from ISC2, the body behind the CISSP. It is explicitly aimed at career starters, career changers, and students, requires no professional experience whatsoever, and covers five foundational domains, from security principles through access control to security operations. Its distinctive feature: as part of the "One Million Certified in Cybersecurity" initiative, ISC2 temporarily offers training and exam free of charge, which has strongly boosted its adoption.

The Security+ from CompTIA is considered one of the most widespread entry-level cybersecurity credentials worldwide. It is vendor-neutral, anchored in the US government environment via DoD 8140, and also appears in German job postings as a baseline requirement. The current version SY0-701 tests not only knowledge questions but also performance-based questions that demand practical thinking.

The numbers in direct comparison

CCSecurity+
ProviderISC2CompTIA
Acquisition cost (exam, EUR)€0€404
Total cost over 5 years (EUR)i€6,230€542
PrerequisitesNone. Entry-level certification without professional experience.No formal prerequisites. Recommended: 2 years IT experience with security focus + Network+.
Exam format100 multiple-choice questions, 2 hours, proctored via Pearson VUE.Max. 90 questions (Multiple-Choice + Performance-based), 90 minutes, Proctored via Pearson VUE. Passing score: 750/900.
Validity3 years3 years
CPE effort15 hrs/year0
CertMap scoreHow we score4 / 12Market strength
3/6
Substance
1/6
7 / 12Market strength
5/6
Substance
2/6

Values live from the CertMap cost methodology (USD fees converted to EUR, totals include annual fees, recertification and CPE time value). Same data basis as the comparison tool.

NICE work role coverage

14 work roles mapped against the NICE framework. Overlap: 6.

CC

4 unique

In both

6 shared

Security+

4 unique

Shared roles (6)

  • Database Administration

    NICE role: Database Administration.Typical job titles: Datenbankadministrator, Database Administrator, DBA

  • Knowledge Management

    NICE role: Knowledge Management.Typical job titles: Wissensmanager, Knowledge Manager

  • Network Operations

    NICE role: Network Operations.Typical job titles: Netzwerkadministrator, Network Engineer, Netzwerktechniker, NOC-Analyst, Netzwerkbetrieb

  • Security Control Assessment

    NICE role: Security Control Assessment.Typical job titles: Security Auditor, IT-Auditor, Sicherheitsauditor, Control Assessor, ISO 27001 Auditor, Compliance-Auditor

  • Software Security Assessment

    NICE role: Software Security Assessment.Typical job titles: Software Security Tester, Software-Sicherheitsanalyst, Secure Code Reviewer

  • Systems Security Management

    NICE role: Systems Security Management.Typical job titles: Informationssicherheitsbeauftragter, ISB, IT-Sicherheitsbeauftragter, Information Security Officer, Security Manager, ISSM

Grey boxes appear in both. Each box = 1 work role, hover shows the name.

Source: curated CertMap mapping against the NICE framework (NIST SP 800-181). Applied uniformly to both certifications, as not all are listed in the C3 crosswalk.

Two patterns stand out in the table that a pure exam-fee comparison misses:

  • Free is not the same as free of cost. With the CC, the exam is temporarily free for first-time candidates, but the certificate is only issued with the first annual fee, and both the fee and continuing education credits recur every year; at least the annual fee covers all of a person's ISC2 certifications together. Security+ costs noticeable money upfront and works on a three-year cycle: collect continuing education points over the cycle (this route is also fee-based at CompTIA), credit a higher CompTIA certification (stacking), or retake the exam. How CertMap calculates such lifetime costs is explained in the cost methodology.
  • Market weight is the actual decision criterion. Security+ has been established for years and is explicitly required in job postings, especially in government-adjacent environments. The CC is considerably younger and built its adoption through the free initiative; as a standalone proof of competence, it carries less weight in the job market so far.

The role mapping below it confirms that this is not about different professions: the overlap of covered NICE roles is large, both target the same entry-level breadth. The decision comes down to model and market weight, not scope.

One opens the door, the other carries the CV. The CC is the low-threshold start into the ISC2 ecosystem, Security+ the classic that appears in requirement profiles.

Prerequisites: no barriers, but different recommendations

Formally both are open, in practice they address different starting positions:

  • CC: No prerequisites, explicitly designed as a first step without professional experience. Anyone still studying or changing careers can take it right away.
  • Security+: Also no formal prerequisites, but CompTIA recommends around two years of IT experience with a security focus plus knowledge at Network+ level. The exam demands noticeably more practical understanding than the CC.

In practical terms: the CC picks people up before their first job, Security+ often fits better after the first one to two years in IT.

The exams

The CC tests 100 multiple-choice questions in two hours, proctored via Pearson VUE. Security+ presents a maximum of 90 questions in 90 minutes, including performance-based questions with simulated hands-on tasks, passing score 750 out of 900 points. Both exams are also available in German, which sets them apart from many specializations in the entry-level segment. Version cycles need to be kept in mind: for the CC, a revised exam outline takes effect on September 1, 2026, renaming and reweighting the five domains, and the Security+ version SY0-701 is expected to be replaced in 2026/2027 according to CompTIA's rhythm.

Our assessment

What our rating says: In the CertMap rating, Security+ ranks clearly ahead of the CC, and the gap arises almost entirely from market recognition: Security+ is the established credential, anchored in job postings and the US government environment, while the CC as a young program is still building market weight. In terms of substance, both sit at the deliberately broad level typical of entry-level certifications; neither proves deep hands-on competence. How the rating axes are constructed is explained in the rating methodology.

The decision becomes easier when approached from your own goal:

  • If you want to find out with low risk whether cybersecurity is the right path, or you are planning the ISC2 route towards SSCP and CISSP, the CC is a sensible start: low barrier, temporarily free, direct connection to the ISC2 ecosystem.
  • If you need to document your entry on your CV, for instance for applications to junior positions or in government-adjacent environments, Security+ serves you better: it is the credential that appears far more often in requirement profiles.
  • The two are not mutually exclusive: a common pattern is the CC as a quick first step and Security+ as the next build-out once some practical experience has been added. Anyone holding both should keep the ongoing obligations in view, because the renewal models are completely different.

Frequently asked questions

Is the CC really free?

The exam is temporarily free for first-time candidates as part of the ISC2 initiative "One Million Certified in Cybersecurity". The certificate itself, however, is only issued with the first annual fee, and from then on the fee and continuing education credits recur annually. The exam is free, the upkeep is not.

Is Security+ enough without prior experience?

Formally yes, there are no admission requirements. However, CompTIA recommends around two years of IT experience with a security focus plus networking fundamentals, and the performance-based questions require practical understanding. If you are starting from zero, the CC as a first step is often the better route.

Are the exams available in German?

Yes, both. The CC is offered in several languages including German, and so is Security+. In the entry-level segment, that is a real advantage over many specializations that are only tested in English.

Read next:CISSP or CISM? Two Careers, One DecisionCertification vs. Certificate: What's the Difference?